ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe impact of pre-infection vaccination on the risk of long COVID remains unclear in the pediatric population. Further, it is unknown if such pre-infection vaccination can mitigate the risk of long COVID beyond its established protective benefits against SARS-CoV-2 infection. ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of BNT162b2 on long COVID risks with various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in children and adolescents, using comparative effectiveness methods. To disentangle the overall effectiveness of the vaccine on long COVID outcomes into its independent impact and indirect impact via prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections, using causal mediation analysis. DesignReal-world vaccine effectiveness study and mediation analysis in three independent cohorts: adolescents (12 to 20 years) during the Delta phase, children (5 to 11 years) and adolescents (12 to 20 years) during the Omicron phase. SettingTwenty health systems in the RECOVER PCORnet electronic health record (EHR) Program. Participants112,590 adolescents (88,811 vaccinated) in the Delta period, 188,894 children (101,277 vaccinated), and 84,735 adolescents (37,724 vaccinated) in the Omicron period. ExposuresFirst dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine vs. no receipt of COVID-19 vaccine. MeasurementsOutcomes of interest include conclusive or probable diagnosis of long COVID following a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection, and body-system-specific condition clusters of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), such as cardiac, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, respiratory, and syndromic categories. The effectiveness was reported as (1-relative risk)*100 and mediating effects were reported as relative risks. ResultsDuring the Delta period, the estimated effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against long COVID among adolescents was 95.4% (95% CI: 90.9% to 97.7%). During the Omicron phase, the estimated effectiveness against long COVID among children was 60.2% (95% CI: 40.3% to 73.5%) and 75.1% (95% CI: 50.4% to 87.5%) among adolescents. The direct effect of vaccination, defined as the effect beyond their impact on SARS-CoV-2 infections, was found to be statistically non-significant in all three study cohorts, with estimates of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.55) in the Delta study among adolescents, 1.24 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.66) among children and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.69 to 1.19) among adolescents in the Omicron studies. Meanwhile, the estimated indirect effects, which are effects through protecting SARS-CoV-2 infections, were estimated as 0.04 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.05) among adolescents during Delta phase, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23 to 0.42) among children and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.27) among adolescents during the Omicron period. LimitationsObservational study design and potentially undocumented infection. ConclusionsOur study suggests that BNT162b2 was effective in reducing risk of long COVID outcomes in children and adolescents during the Delta and Omicron periods. The mediation analysis indicates the vaccines effectiveness is primarily derived from its role in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Primary Funding SourceNational Institutes of Health.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Musculoskeletal DiseasesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND The current understanding of the long-term effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine for a range of outcomes across diverse U.S. pediatric populations is limited. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of BNT162b2 against various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus using data from a national collaboration of pediatric health systems (PEDSnet). METHODS We emulated three target trials to assess the real-world effectiveness of BNT162b2: adolescents aged 12 to 20 years during the Delta variant period (Target trial 1), children aged 5 to 11 years (Target trial 2) and adolescents aged 12 to 20 years during the Omicron variant period (Target trial 3). The outcomes included documented infection, COVID-19 illness severity, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), and two cardiac-related outcomes, myocarditis and pericarditis. In the U.S., immunization records are often captured and stored across multiple disconnected sources, resulting in incomplete vaccination records in patients' electronic health records (EHR). We implemented a novel trial emulation pipeline accounting for possible misclassification bias in vaccine documentation in EHRs. The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine was estimated from the Poisson regression model with confounders balanced via propensity score stratification. RESULTS During the Delta period, the BNT162b2 vaccine demonstrated an overall effectiveness 98.4% (95% CI, 98.1 to 98.7) against documented infection among adolescents, with no significant waning after receipt of the first dose. During the Omicron period, the overall effectiveness was estimated to be 74.3% (95% CI, 72.2 to 76.2) in preventing documented infection among children, which was higher against moderate or severe COVID-19 (75.5%; 95% CI, 69.0 to 81.0) and ICU admission with COVID-19 (84.9%; 95% CI, 64.8 to 93.5). In the adolescent population, the overall effectiveness against documented Omicron infection was 85.5% (95% CI, 83.8 to 87.1), with effectiveness of 84.8% (95% CI, 77.3 to 89.9) against moderate or severe COVID-19, and 91.5% (95% CI, 69.5 to 97.6) against ICU admission with COVID-19. The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against the Omicron variant declined after 4 months following the first dose and then stabilized with higher levels of uncertainty. Across all three cohorts, the risk of cardiac outcomes was approximately 65% to 85% lower in the vaccinated group than that of the unvaccinated group accounting for possible misclassification bias. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests BNT162b2 was effective among children and adolescents in Delta and Omicron periods for a range of COVID-19-related outcomes and is associated with a lower risk for cardiac complications. Waning effectiveness over time suggests that revaccination may be needed in the future.